MyLam
Chamber Cleaning Optimizations Can Reduce Carbon Emissions by 32%
Graphic of nitrogen trifluoride molecule with a chart showing its second place in greenhouse gas potential
NF3 ranks second in global warming potential among greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Mar 17, 2025
|
  • Lam engineers collaborated with a customer to cut NF3 gas consumption 
  • Results demonstrate the potentially large benefits of small optimizations 

The semiconductor industry is always seeking ways to use fewer resources in the manufacturing process, which can help improve overall sustainability.  

Recently, we collaborated with our customer ST Microelectronics to develop an in-situ plasma clean technique that uses less nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) gas in the etch chamber cleaning process without impacting overall throughput. 

We realized that we don’t need to re-invent the wheel for more sustainable practices. Reducing gas flows in a widely used process like chamber plasma clean is just one way to improve and optimize what’s already available.  

Leveraging feedback from the Lam Research Fremont Lab and using Lam Equipment Intelligence® in-house software (including a greenhouse gas calculator), we found that our solution have the potential to deliver: 

  • 33% lower NF3 consumption thanks to reduced gas flows; 
  • 8% faster clean times through clean process time optimization; and  
  • 32% lower CO2e emissions. 

The Role of NF3 in Chamber Cleaning 

Plasma chamber clean is a well-known process used in the semiconductor industry, particularly in etch chambers, to ensure repeatable wall conditions for every wafer and to enhance wafer particle performance.  

NF3 gas is used to remove precoat and silicon byproducts from etch chamber walls. NF3 is known to have a high global warming potential (GWP), but it also has a relatively good dissociation rate (85%), meaning it can be easily broken down into smaller components that often have lower GWP values. The main byproduct of NF3 dissociation is silicon tetrafluoride (SiF4), which has a very low GWP (<1). 

By reducing NF3 gas flows while maintaining overall throughput, our research team was able to reduce CO2e emissions 32% after abatement.  

Diagram showing a close up of one etch chamber, with precoat applied to walls, and each step of the etch process including first preconditioning clean, etch residuals deposits, post process clean including the in situ plasma chamber clean, and precoat deposit that starts the cycle again.

In our study, we found NF3 use could be reduced successfully during the in-situ plasma chamber clean step (Step 3).  

Our Study on Optimizing NF3 Gas Usage  

We worked with ST to develop a short-term solution that reduces the use of high GWP gases like NF3 that is also relatively easy to implement and doesn’t jeopardize the quality of the production.  

The amount of NF3 gas needed depends on the process recipe itself, which influences the amount of precoat (made of SiOCl) applied in the chamber. Harsher process chemistries will chemically attack the precoat layer on the chamber walls. Therefore, thickness of the precoat determines how much NF3 is needed to remove it.   

We applied our modified in situ plasma clean during the waferless autoclean step, during which the chamber is cleaned of all remaining materials (precoat, etch residuals, carbon contaminants, etc.)  

The two authors presenting their study at Semicon Europa 2024 with their collaborator from ST Microelectronics.

The authors Luigi Mascarello (left) and Maximilien Nebois (right) at Semicon Europa 2024 present their study with ST Microelectronics’ Cyril Villieu (center) on reducing carbon emissions during the etch cleaning process.  

We conducted several experiments using blanket wafers and found that NF3 in most cases could easily be reduced by 300 sccm with very little effect on throughput. We realized the current waferless autoclean time was overly long and not optimized for specific process recipes. Shortening the residence time helped reduce overall NF3 consumption and the carbon footprint induced by those cleans.      

These promising results represent a step in the right direction toward a more sustainable and efficient etch and clean process on a significant portion of the ST Microelectronics installed base.  

Luigi Mascarello is a senior engineer of technical program management and Maximilien Nebois is a field process engineer at Lam Research. 

 Related Articles & Related Information 

 

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements  

Statements made in this article that are not of historical fact are forward-looking statements and are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to but are not limited to market and industry trends; the potential applications, benefits, and opportunities related to our processes, technologies, and products; and the potential sustainability benefits and emission reductions of our processes, products, and technologies. Some factors that may affect these forward-looking statements include: trade regulations, export controls, trade disputes, and other geopolitical tensions may inhibit our ability to sell our products; business, political and/or regulatory conditions in the consumer electronics industry, the semiconductor industry and the overall economy may deteriorate or change; the actions of our customers and competitors may be inconsistent with our expectations; supply chain cost increases and other inflationary pressures have impacted and may continue to impact our profitability; supply chain disruptions or manufacturing capacity constraints may limit our ability to manufacture and sell our products; and natural and human-caused disasters, disease outbreaks, war, terrorism, political or governmental unrest or instability, or other events beyond our control may impact our operations in affected areas; as well as the other risks and uncertainties that are described in the documents filed or furnished by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including specifically the Risk Factors described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 2024. These uncertainties and changes could materially affect the forward-looking statements and cause actual results to vary from expectations in a material way. The Company undertakes no obligation to update the information or statements made in this article. 

circle-arrow2circle-arrow2facebookgooglehandshake2health2linkedinmenupdfplant2searchtwitteryoutube